#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Rouen	5	4	1	54:20	0.800
2.	Chartres	5	3	2	45:24	0.600
3.	Senart	5	3	2	32:16	0.600
4.	Clermont-Ferrand	5	3	2	32:36	0.600
5.	Paris	5	3	2	17:28	0.600
6.	Montpellier	5	2	3	24:24	0.400
7.	Savigny	5	2	3	24:44	0.400
8.	Tolosa	5	1	4	20:36	0.200

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Rouen	10	8	2	79:32	0.800
2.	Senart	10	7	3	71:33	0.700
3.	Montpellier	10	6	4	59:38	0.600
4.	Paris	10	6	4	42:54	0.600
5.	Clermont-Ferrand	10	4	6	47:75	0.400
6.	Savigny	10	4	6	51:80	0.400
7.	Chartres	10	3	7	65:59	0.300
8.	Tolosa	10	3	7	35:63	0.300

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Rouen	15	13	2	122:44	0.867
2.	Senart	15	10	5	113:55	0.667
3.	Montpellier	15	9	6	81:55	0.600
4.	Paris	15	8	7	72:84	0.533
5.	Chartres	15	6	9	84:86	0.400
6.	Tolosa	15	5	10	48:79	0.333
7.	Clermont-Ferrand	15	5	10	57:110	0.333
8.	Savigny	15	4	11	68:132	0.267

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Rouen	20	17	3	165:55	0.850
2.	Senart	20	14	6	150:70	0.700
3.	Montpellier	20	11	9	104:82	0.550
4.	Paris	20	10	10	104:125	0.500
5.	Chartres	20	8	12	108:124	0.400
6.	Tolosa	20	8	12	83:107	0.400
7.	Clermont-Ferrand	20	7	13	81:137	0.350
8.	Savigny	20	5	15	85:180	0.250

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Rouen	25	21	4	210:73	0.840
2.	Senart	25	19	6	193:80	0.760
3.	Montpellier	25	15	10	141:92	0.600
4.	Tolosa	25	10	15	99:133	0.400
5.	Clermont-Ferrand	25	10	15	127:171	0.400
6.	Paris	25	10	15	123:184	0.400
7.	Chartres	25	9	16	124:171	0.360
8.	Savigny	25	6	19	103:216	0.240

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Rouen	28	24	4	232:76	0.857
2.	Senart	28	22	6	220:87	0.786
3.	Montpellier	28	18	10	169:103	0.643
4.	Tolosa	28	12	16	127:150	0.429
5.	Clermont-Ferrand	28	11	17	134:188	0.393
6.	Paris	28	10	18	135:214	0.357
7.	Chartres	28	9	19	131:199	0.321
8.	Savigny	28	6	22	112:243	0.214

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF