#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Mayabeque	5	4	1	34:12	0.800
2.	Las Tunas	5	4	1	50:30	0.800
3.	Villa Clara	5	4	1	31:17	0.800
4.	Matanzas	5	3	2	44:33	0.600
5.	Santiago de Cuba	5	3	2	40:29	0.600
6.	Cienfuegos	5	3	2	25:15	0.600
7.	Isla Juventud	5	3	2	31:36	0.600
8.	Sancti Spiritus	5	3	2	27:36	0.600
9.	Pinar del Rio	5	3	2	26:37	0.600
10.	Ciego de Avila	5	2	3	38:34	0.400
11.	Holguin	5	2	3	22:26	0.400
12.	Industriales	5	2	3	30:35	0.400
13.	Granma	5	2	3	14:20	0.400
14.	Artemisa	5	2	3	23:30	0.400
15.	Camaguey	5	1	4	22:39	0.200
16.	Guantanamo	5	0	5	24:43	0.000

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Villa Clara	10	7	3	65:39	0.700
2.	Las Tunas	10	7	3	76:52	0.700
3.	Matanzas	10	7	3	73:49	0.700
4.	Mayabeque	10	7	3	57:33	0.700
5.	Sancti Spiritus	10	6	4	53:76	0.600
6.	Industriales	10	5	5	59:55	0.500
7.	Cienfuegos	10	5	5	52:52	0.500
8.	Pinar del Rio	10	5	5	52:54	0.500
9.	Isla Juventud	10	5	5	72:81	0.500
10.	Granma	10	5	5	33:43	0.500
11.	Holguin	10	4	6	66:58	0.400
12.	Artemisa	10	4	6	51:52	0.400
13.	Ciego de Avila	10	4	6	56:59	0.400
14.	Santiago de Cuba	10	4	6	59:71	0.400
15.	Camaguey	10	3	7	41:65	0.300
16.	Guantanamo	10	1	9	47:78	0.100

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Las Tunas	15	11	4	104:74	0.733
2.	Villa Clara	15	10	5	94:52	0.667
3.	Cienfuegos	15	10	5	92:67	0.667
4.	Matanzas	15	9	6	93:71	0.600
5.	Mayabeque	15	9	6	77:62	0.600
6.	Holguin	15	8	7	117:84	0.533
7.	Artemisa	15	8	7	97:81	0.533
8.	Industriales	15	8	7	82:72	0.533
9.	Granma	15	8	7	59:68	0.533
10.	Pinar del Rio	15	7	8	84:76	0.467
11.	Isla Juventud	15	7	8	96:119	0.467
12.	Sancti Spiritus	15	7	8	73:115	0.467
13.	Ciego de Avila	15	5	10	68:76	0.333
14.	Santiago de Cuba	15	5	10	87:128	0.333
15.	Guantanamo	15	5	10	64:107	0.333
16.	Camaguey	15	4	11	61:89	0.267

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Cienfuegos	20	14	6	136:83	0.700
2.	Mayabeque	20	13	7	116:80	0.650
3.	Holguin	20	12	8	172:114	0.600
4.	Villa Clara	20	12	8	114:76	0.600
5.	Las Tunas	20	12	8	128:109	0.600
6.	Industriales	20	11	9	109:90	0.550
7.	Artemisa	20	11	9	132:119	0.550
8.	Matanzas	20	11	9	123:125	0.550
9.	Pinar del Rio	20	10	10	124:90	0.500
10.	Granma	20	9	11	79:109	0.450
11.	Sancti Spiritus	20	9	11	93:142	0.450
12.	Ciego de Avila	20	8	12	94:105	0.400
13.	Santiago de Cuba	20	8	12	129:161	0.400
14.	Isla Juventud	20	8	12	116:154	0.400
15.	Camaguey	20	6	14	76:109	0.300
16.	Guantanamo	20	5	15	74:161	0.250

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Holguin	25	17	8	209:139	0.680
2.	Las Tunas	25	16	9	164:119	0.640
3.	Cienfuegos	25	16	9	156:117	0.640
4.	Mayabeque	25	15	10	161:109	0.600
5.	Pinar del Rio	25	14	11	160:114	0.560
6.	Villa Clara	25	14	11	123:86	0.560
7.	Industriales	25	14	11	137:113	0.560
8.	Matanzas	25	13	12	146:169	0.520
9.	Ciego de Avila	25	12	13	132:132	0.480
10.	Sancti Spiritus	25	12	13	115:170	0.480
11.	Artemisa	25	11	14	151:155	0.440
12.	Granma	25	11	14	102:140	0.440
13.	Isla Juventud	25	10	15	155:188	0.400
14.	Camaguey	25	9	16	109:130	0.360
15.	Santiago de Cuba	25	8	17	149:199	0.320
16.	Guantanamo	25	7	18	98:188	0.280

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Squadra	PG	V	P	R	%V	Forma
1.	Holguin	30	20	10	246:177	0.667
2.	Las Tunas	30	20	10	211:155	0.667
3.	Cienfuegos	30	20	10	184:132	0.667
4.	Pinar del Rio	30	19	11	182:120	0.633
5.	Mayabeque	30	18	12	205:131	0.600
6.	Industriales	30	18	12	175:144	0.600
7.	Villa Clara	30	16	14	147:115	0.533
8.	Granma	30	14	16	133:167	0.467
9.	Matanzas	30	14	16	160:199	0.467
10.	Sancti Spiritus	30	14	16	143:195	0.467
11.	Artemisa	30	13	17	186:188	0.433
12.	Ciego de Avila	30	13	17	148:157	0.433
13.	Isla Juventud	30	12	18	177:207	0.400
14.	Camaguey	30	10	20	136:176	0.333
15.	Guantanamo	30	10	20	126:214	0.333
16.	Santiago de Cuba	30	9	21	196:258	0.300

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH